Visual Description

The Metadata Enhancement tool empowers GAC partners with the ability to generate asset descriptions. As for the figure below, there are different pre-compiled prompts which can be used.

The tool can look at all the assets whose metadata whose CMS metadata is incomplete or at a subset adding the list of 500 maximum assets IDs, using the drop down menu represented below.

The tool will run a preliminary analysis of the assets and confirm their validity. After that you can press ok and the preview will be generated.

Note: if you are running the Apply functionality, you will be able to revert the operation, using the “Revert all” button (below), if after checking the changes on your CMS you are not satisfied with the output. You can still revert individual changes in the CMS.

As for all the Metadata Enhancements functionalities, there are 2 options for the handling the data output, "Apply" and "Run and manually approve":

Apply: This option automatically accepts and saves the AI-generated content into the missing metadata fields on the CMS. It's suitable when you are confident in the AI's accuracy and want to quickly enrich your collection's metadata.
Run and manually approve: This option generates the AI-suggested content for missing fields but requires your manual review and approval before the changes are saved. This gives you direct control to fact-check and verify the accuracy of the generated content, ensuring it aligns with your standards before publishing. This is particularly useful for critical fields or when a higher degree of human oversight is desired. You will be able to Approve or Reject entries using the buttons underneath each of the assets and this operation will be applied at individual assets level.

Note: if previous values exist for the “Description” field, they will be overwritten if the user asked to “Apply” the changes without review, otherwise will be marked with a warning label in the review page, if “Run and manually approve” action was selected.

CSV export/import: If you use the "Run and manually approve" option, the AI-generated suggestions are marked as "requires review."

If you then export your data to a CSV file from the CMS, these suggestions are included. If you edit this CSV file and re-import it, all "requires review" suggestions from the CSV will be automatically approved.

They will keep their AI-generated status and association with the enhancement job. You will also see an extra line in the confirmation dialog after the re-import.

Please be mindful of this if you use a CSV export/import workflow.

Disclaimer: As with all AI-generated content, it is possible that there will be occasional mistakes.

Was this helpful?

How can we improve it?